Finding Nemo? No, Finding Research

Finding Nemo? No, Finding Research

This assignment measures your ability on how to assess the quality of various sources of information, distinguish peer-reviewed sources, and how to evaluate their credibility for use in . This assessment also supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcome 1.

In this assignment, you will be critically evaluating the quality and credibility of various sources of information. More specifically, you will continue exploring the University of Arizona Global Campus Library to locate both primary and secondary sources of information appropriate for academic research that relate to the topic you identified in this week’s discussion posting.

Instructions First, you will conduct a scholarly search using the key words “action research”and your chosen topic from Week 1 Discussion: Topic Selection (such as testing and assessment, educational standards, educational technology, literacy strategies, culturally and linguistically diverse students, safe classroom environments, disability research in general, AD/HD, autism, emotional/behavioral disturbance, intellectual disabilities or learning disabilities, etc.) and the grade level of your current or future professional goal. Your search should be conducted using a scholarly search option, such as ,, , or any other major search engine. For example, “action research and AD/HD and first grade.” Be sure to take the time to inform yourself on sound research sources including use of peer reviews as listed in the recommended and required resources for the week.

· To get you started, view  Next, you will analyze the first five results that appear from your search in a table format using Microsoft Word.

Then, using the same keywords you used to search the web, you will conduct a search in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library using one of the academic databases (ERIC, ProQuest, , and so forth) and create a table such as the one below using Microsoft Word. Finally, you will select two sources from either table that you feel are the best overall based on currency, credibility, authority, and academic integrity and construct a summary. For each article in your tables, use the following format:

APA Reference Entry Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Periodical, volume number(issue number), pages. http://dx.doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyyy 
Source Type (e.g., journal article, magazine article, book, and so forth)
Annotation (e.g., two to three sentences summarizing the contents of the source)

Written Communication: Using support from your assigned reading, the Instructor Guidance, and the discussions, submit the following for evaluation. Use the following guidelines for creating your written assignment. If you have questions about the assignment or the rubric, please contact your instructor before the due date.

In your paper,

· Web Search (3 points): Construct a table that includes a 6th edition , source type, and a two- to three-sentence annotation for five scholarly sources gathered from an open web search.

· Library Search (3 points): Construct a table that includes a 6th edition APA-formatted reference entry, source type, and a two- to three-sentence annotation for five scholarly sources gathered from a library search.

· Learning (2.5 points): In a paragraph, explain what you learned through this process of selecting articles and what was most informative for you about this experience.

The Finding Nemo? No, Finding Research Assignment

· Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the .

· Must include a separate title page with the following:

· Title of Finding Nemo? No, Finding Research

· Student’s name

· Course name and number

· Instructor’s name

· Date submitted

· Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.

· The  table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.

· Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

· Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to as outlined in the Writing Center.

Next Steps: Review and Submit the Assignment

· Review your assignment with the Grading Rubric to ensure you have achieved the distinguished levels of performance for each criterion. Next, submit your document no later than Day 7.

Recommendation:  The MACI, MAED, MASE and MATLT  programs provide the opportunity for you to create an online portfolio (Folio) that can be used in your career development and professional practice. Throughout your respective programs, you will have various assessments that can be included in this e-portfolio, and these will be finalized in the final capstone course, Capstone 2: Culminating Project, EDU696. You may select this assignment and subsequent to include as work samples. Therefore, it is strongly encouraged you save your coursework in your e-portfolio Folio.

Success Tip: Be mindful of the Week 6 Final Project. The Week 6 project involves conducting a peer review of an action research proposal. Preparation for this assignment must begin early to make certain you are planning ahead and saving your work. Review the full instructions for the Week 6 assignment for specific information.

Carefully review the  for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.