Essay on” Marriage as a Social Institute “

Essay on” Marriage as a Social Institute “

Family as a Social Institution Who counts as family? A close examination of theoretical perspectives and ways in which researchers gather data allow for a better understanding of how families work. Chapter 1 looks broadly at the term family and its varying definitions and interpretations. Two important questions in the sociology of family are focused on 1. how family is defined (or, in practical terms, who counts as a family?) and, 2. how does the question of what is a family matter for everyday life? When we consider how it matters, we look at ways in which family as an institution overlaps and interacts with other institutions, how and when family must fit formal definitions, and requirements in order for a family to be seen as legitimate. For this discussion, consider Peterson’s 2013 article, “The Lies That Bind” which addresses types of families that have been historically required to conform to traditional models. Assignment starts here: Using your own words, address the following: Is our society so historically and thoroughly embedded with heteronormativity that this standard is applied reflexively and uncritically? What is the result of heteronormative standards in family interaction and in situations of family evaluation? Select one social theory and discuss how it explains heteronomativity within a society. Your answer should be between 300-350 words and is due Sunday (11:59pm). Your grade will be determined by taking into account the quality of your answers. Late work is not accepted. Do not use direct quotes. UPDATE: one essay (300-350 words) that addresses the points listed. Rubric Essay 20 pts Essay 20 pts Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 15 pts Exemplary Work is completed and demonstrated superior knowledge of activity through provided content and organization. 12.86 pts Proficient Work was completed satisfactorily but may have minor errors demonstrating knowledge. 11 pts Developing Work was completed but showed errors in demonstrating knowledge. 7 pts Beginning Work is partially completed or demonstrated little knowledge of activity. 0 pts Not Evident Work demonstrates no knowledge of activity. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/Writing 5 pts Exemplary Writer makes few errors in grammar, spelling, language mechanics, word usage, punctuation, etc., that do not distract the reader. Meaning is clear. 4 pts Proficient Writer makes some errors in grammar, spelling, language mechanics, word usage, punctuation, etc., that distract the reader. Meaning is generally clear. 3 pts Developing Some errors in grammar, spelling, language mechanics, word usage, punctuation, etc., that distract the reader. 2 pts Beginning Extensive errors in grammar, spelling, language mechanics, assigned vocabulary usage, punctuation, etc., that distract the reader and make it difficult to decipher the meaning intended by the writer. 0 pts Not Evident Student does not display a command of standard English. 5 pts Total Points: 20